Legal Opinion

Russell v. Jacoway

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Petition for writ of Prohibition. Rose for the Petitioners.

1Opinion of the Court

HarrisoN, J.:

This is an application by Thomas J. Russell and Jacob L. Shinn, for a Writ of Prohibition to the Circuit Court of Pope County, to restrain proceedings on a writ of certiorari sued out of it by William B. Young, and others, to the County Court of said county.

The facts upon which the application is made, as stated in the relator’s petition and admitted, are the following:

At the July term, 1878, of the County Court of said county, a petition, signed by one-third of the electors of the county, was presented for the removal of the county seat from Dover to Russellville, or Atkins, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Arnold v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  3. Ex parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1842
  4. Reeves v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Monette Road Improvement District v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. State Ex Relator McNamara v. ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Freeman v. LazarusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. BandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. District No. 21 United Mine Workers of America v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API