Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPugg, C.J.

This petition for a writ of mandamus has *68been reserved for determination upon the petition, the answers and a statement of agreed facts. The object of the proceeding is to determine whether the petitioner is the chairman of the finance commission of the city of Boston. The material facts shown by the record are these: In consequence of an existing vacancy, on December 27, 1934, the Governor of the Commonwealth with the advice and consent of the Council constituted and appointed the petitioner to be a member of the finance commission, and designated him chairman “ . . . to hold said trust for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blake v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Attorney General v. TillinghastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Attorney General v. DrohanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Buchannan v. MeisnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Terminal Construction Corp. v. Bergen County Hackensack River Sanitary Sewer District AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Finance Commission of Boston v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Coleman v. LouisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Duggan v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Answer of the Justices to the GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API