Roman v. City of Leavenworth
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Leavenworth district court; James H. Wendorff, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
When this case was here before the facts and the law were thoroughly covered. (Roman v. City of Leavenworth, 90 Kan. 379, 133 Pac. 551.) This time the plaintiff won and the city appeals. The plaintiff moves to dismiss because the defendant did not provide a transcript of the evidence to which the appellee might refer in making a necessary countér-abstract. We do not think it proper to dismiss the appeal, but the failure to provide a transcript of the evidence will greatly restrict the scope of this review. The principal ground of appeal is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roman v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gilligan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Galleher v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Gorman v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Darst v. SwazeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.