Clark v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. September 17, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Plaintiff in error was convicted of manufacturing liquor, and made an extraordinary motion for a new trial.
1. Hpon the hearing of this motion the movant offered an affidavit, a portion of which is as follows: “ At a subsequent term of court, after defendant’s conviction for manufacturing liquor, he was placed on trial for having liquor in his possession, and the same bottle of liquid used in the case for manufacturing was used against him in the case for possessing, and defendant was acquitted *237on the latter charge. I kept possession of the bottle and know the facts.” The bill of exceptions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loewenherz v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Norwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Story v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932