Legal Opinion

Dyck v. Albertelli Law

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 29, 2011No. 11-65CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiff Jacob-Franz: Dyck filed a pro se complaint in this court on January 31, 2011, on behalf of 142 trusts he names as plaintiffs, for which he alleges he is named “Trustee for all Plaintiff Common Law, Irrevocable, Contractual Pure Trust,” and “trustee of all Trusts being presented.” The complaint is 134 pages long, consists of 293 numbered paragraphs, and attempts to name 71 different defendants. Each defendant named by plaintiff is either a former state government official or a private party. Neither the United States nor any federal government…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Samy Gharb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Zephyr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Zeroavia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API