Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Otis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSandeeson, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for injuries caused by escaping gas. There are three counts, based upon negligence of the defendants, in permitting gas and heating appliances to become defective, to be and remain out of repair, and in knowingly letting to the plaintiff a room wherein the gas fixtures and appliances were defective. ■

The plaintiff was the only witness called. She hired of the defendants a room, lighted and heated by gas, in a building owned by them, for which she paid rent in advance. When the agreement was made, the plaintiff noticed that the gas fixture in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Shinners v. Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Hill v. Iver Johnson Sporting Goods Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Albright v. ShererMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Doxstater v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brian v. B. Sopkin & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Knowles v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Wardwell v. George H. Taylor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Boyle v. Cambridge Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API