Legal Opinion
DeRousse v. Higginson
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1973No. 10720Published
1Opinion of the Court
505 P.2d 321 (1973)
95 Idaho 173
C. V. DeROUSSE, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
R. Keith HIGGINSON, as State Reclamation Engineer and Daniel R. Musselman as Water Master for Water District 12-A, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 10720.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
January 17, 1973.
W. Anthony Park, Atty. Gen., Phillip M. Barber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for defendants-appellants.
Barry L. Marcus, Marcus & Marcus, Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.
John A. Rosholt, Parry, Robertson, Daly & Larson, Twin Falls, amicus curiae.
BAKES, Justice.
This entire controversy revolves around a construction and interpretation of §§ 42-605…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.