Baily Petition
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Ladner,
This matter came before the court below on a petition for a Declaratory Judgment, Answers thereto, and. a stipulation of facts. The essential facts may be summarized as follows:
James Stewart devised by Par. 6 of Ms will, a 122 acre farm to Ms son John, 72 acres absolutely and the remaining 50 acres for life, and if John died leaving issue, then to such issue in fee. “But should my said son John die without issue living at the time of his death, then said fifty acres is to revert to my three daughters, Maria, Emma and Mary E. to be held by them in equal proportions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trustees of the Proprietors v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Wettengel v. GormleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- McIntosh v. RoppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Estate of FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Merrick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Cumberland Valley Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Kleintop v. KleintopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hanna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.