Burk v. Muskegon Machine & Foundry Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Bill to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Order overruling demurrer reversed, and recorded remanded, with leave to complainant to apply for leave to amend the bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to a bill to foreclose a builder’s lien claimed under a contract with the Muskegon Machine & Foundry Company. Eight other parties are joined as defendants, under a general allegation that they “have or claim to have an interest in the premises, or in some part or parts thereof, as subsequent purchasers, mortgagees, lien claimants, or otherwise.” One John J. Howden is also made defendant, and the bill alleges, respecting him, that on September 20, 1892, complainant “caused to be served upon one John J. Howden, who theretofore, and on or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sweet v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People ex rel. Tremper v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Prather Engineering Co. v. Detroit, Flint & Saginaw RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Earle v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Haag v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- In Re Guaranty Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.