Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Justice

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 20, 1962No. 15,247Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

I dissent.

I am unable to join in any way with my brothers in their view that a rehearing is not required in this case with respect to the charge of rape, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 120, 10 USC § 920. In my opinion, the need for reversal because of the introduction of the bloodstained bedding and failure to declare a mistrial after ruling accused’s oral pretrial statement inadmissible is amply demonstrated by this record. I am not persuaded that we may properly avoid this result by weighing the evidence and resolving plain factual issues in favor of the United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. AlanizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API