Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bean v. Diamond Alkali Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1969No. 10203Published

1Dissent

McQUADE, J.,

dissenting, and DONALDSON, J., concurring in the dissent.

Plaintiff Bean and the other witnesses called on his behalf were permitted over appellants’ objections to assert to the jury that the herbicide Dacthal W-75 caused extensive failure of Bean’s onion seed crop. This was prejudicial error for the following reasons.

Expert testimony has been defined generally in the following manner:

“Expert testimony is an opinion of a witness possessing peculiar knowledge, wisdom, skill, or information regarding the subject-matter under consideration, acquired by study, investigation,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Startin v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. National Zinc Co., Inc. v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Paisley v. American Zinc Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API