Twelves & Co. v. Lodano
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error to the County Court of Mobile. Before the Hon. John A. Cuthbert, Judge. The facts fully appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChilton, J.
The plaintiff in' error, having sued out an attachment against one William J. Faries, the sheriff served a summons of garnishment upon the defendant in error, to appear before the county court to which the attachment was made returnable, to answer what he was indebted, &c., to Faries. At the trial term of the attachment, Faries appeared and confessed judgment upon the attachment, in favor of the plaintiffs, for the sum of $255 89. At the same term, a judgment nisi was rendered against the plaintiff in error, he having failed to appear, in obedience to the summons. A scire facias having…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grates v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Hitt v. LaceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finch v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- P. A. Geier Co. v. Reliance Electric & Engineering Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1913
- Wheeling Traction Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1924