Legal Opinion

Hagen v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Ins. Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1984No. 17193-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

This is a contested garnishment proceeding brought against an insurer by the insured’s assignee. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the assignee, Hagen. The court of appeals reversed and remanded with instructions. Hagen v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, 138 Ariz. 521, 675 P.2d 1340 (App.1983). Both parties have petitioned us for review. See Rule 23(a), Arizona Rules of Civ.App.Proc., 17A A.R.S.

After review of the record, we conclude that the opinion of the court of appeals is correct and that all issues were properly decided.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Dale C. Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc. Ralph Smith, and Michael L. Miller, Dale C. Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc. Michael L. Miller, and Ralph SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API