Legal Opinion
Lockett v. Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided November 14, 2001No. CIV A. 00-0989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LEMMON, District Judge.
Defendants Village of Folsom, Marshell Brumfield, and Merty Fitzmorris have filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Document 53). IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims under the Clean Water Act are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs’ state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
A. Factual Background.
The eight plaintiffs own property in and around Folsom, Louisiana. On August 12, 1999, plaintiffs Carl and Beryl Lockett sent a “Notice of Violations and Notice of Intent to Sue for Violations of the Clean Water Act on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- North and South Rivers Watershed Association, Inc. v. Town of ScituateCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Rudolph Jones, Jr. Susan Jones Tandy Jones Gilliland v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Washington Public Interest Research Group ("Washpirg") v. Pendleton Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Bettis v. Town of Ontario, NYDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lockett v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003