North and South Rivers Watershed Association, Inc. v. Town of Scituate
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeals from district court granting of Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, claiming the district court erred in ruling Appellant’s suit was barred under section 309 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Because the State had commenced and was diligently prosecuting an enforcement action under State law comparable to the Federal Act Appellant sought to enforce, we AFFIRM the district court’s ruling that Appellant is barred under the Federal Clean Water Act section 309(g)(6)(A) and granting of Appellee’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1987, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Severstal Sparrows Point, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Group Against Smog & Pollution, Inc. v. Shenango Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Continental Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.