Legal Opinion
Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corporation Of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 1956No. 14968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.2d 386
Harry X. BERGMAN, Perma-Lox Aluminum Shingle Corporation and Victor H. Langville, doing business under the assumed name of Langville Manufacturing Company, Appellants,
v.
ALUMINUM LOCK SHINGLE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee.
No. 14968.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
October 12, 1956.
Rehearing Denied November 20, 1956.
Elmer A. Buckhorn, Buckhorn & Cheatham, Robert F. Maguire, Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, J. Pierre Kolisch, Ramsey & Kolisch, Portland, Or., for appellant.
S. J. Bischoff, Portland, Or., H. H. Brown, H. A. Toulmin, Jr., Toulmin & Toulmin, Dayton,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walter W. Johnson Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Metal Coating Corporation, a Corporation v. National Steel Construction Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- American Cyanamid Company v. Lincoln Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corporation Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Tapeswitch Corporation of America v. Recora Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976