Legal Opinion
Patera v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 5, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-04533-JSCPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 11
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Marci Patera brings this action seeking to prevent foreclosure of her home. She sues Defendants Citibank, N. A., and CitiMortgage, Inc. (together, “Defendants”). Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 11.) Defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to join a necessary and indispensable party. After carefully considering the arguments…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alphonso v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Byelick v. Ryvyl Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Foyer v. Wells Fargo, NA.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Santana v. BSI Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Shepardson v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee for Bungalow Series IV TrustDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.