Legal Opinion

In re Desmarais

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 16, 2017No. 2016–0224Published

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

The petitioner, Beverly Desmarais, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (CAB) denying her request for attorney's fees and costs that she incurred in litigating a fee dispute with the respondents, Utica National Insurance Group (Utica) and AMI Graphics. The CAB determined that, although the Workers' Compensation Law entitled the petitioner to attorney's fees and costs associated with litigating the merits of her workers' compensation claim, it did not further entitle her to fees and *219costs incurred in successfully litigating the fee dispute. We reverse and remand.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Orange Blossom Ltd. Partnership v. Southern California Sunbelt Developers, Inc. (In Re Southern California Sunbelt Developers, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Lamar Advertising Co. v. Charter Township of Van BurenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Spicer v. Virginia Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation ProgramCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API