Legal Opinion

Cleveland Nat. Bank v. Amos

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1913No. 2809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court, Pawnee County; Fred 8. Liscon, Judge. Action bjr the Cleveland National Bank against James Amos. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

The question herein presented grew out of an action in replevin by the plaintiff in error against James Amos to replevy a certain mule, possession ox which plaintiff claimed by virtue of a chattel mortgage and defendant claimed by virtue of purchase at public sale. The facts out of which the questions here presented grew were: That one L. E. Crumpton was indebted to the plaintiff bank on two certain promissory notes, one for $49.25, secured by a chattel mortgage on the mule in question; the other for $50.75, secured by mortgage on a' buggy and harness. The payment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Bird v. Benton & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Cardinell v. O'dowdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Citizen Bank v. CareyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
  5. Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API