Williams v. Hahn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County denying a motion to dissolve an attachment. E. D. Ham, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant executed his promissory note to W. B. Bourn, November 8, 1890, for the sum of two thousand dollars, payable six months after date, and, at the same time, delivered to him twenty-seven thousand gallons of wine as collateral security for its payment, with authority to the payee, or his assigns, in case of default in the payment of the note, to sell the same and apply the proceeds upon the note. This authority is in the following terms:
“Should the note or any part thereof, or the interest accruing thereon, remain due and unpaid after the same should have been paid according to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bendel v. Crystal Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lowe v. OzmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- George Jue v. Irving I. Bass, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Bennett v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Western Board of Adjusters, Inc. v. Covina Publishing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Farmers State Bank v. GrayIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.