Bateman v. Small & Tharpe
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Houston county—Judge Eiley. November 18, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwouth, J.
1. Small & Tharpe sued Bateman for the balance due on a promissory note given for the purchase-price of two mules, and containing, among other provisions, the following: “And the subscriber hereby agrees to pay the within obligation although the property should die or become damaged or destroyed, whether by accident or otherwise. . . It is further understood and agreed that said Small & Tharpe do not guarantee the health, soundness, working qualities . . of the within described property, and it is further understood and agreed that should said live stock herein described be not suited to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BelliwithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Stoddard Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gossett & Sons v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- North Georgia Production Credit Ass'n v. VandergriftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Citizens Bank, Vienna v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Lee v. LovelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Hodge v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.