Legal Opinion

Tulsa County v. St. John's Hospital

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1948No. 33144PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents the question of whether property located in Tulsa county, owned, used, and operated by the Sisters of the .Sorrowful Mother, a corporation domesticated under the laws of the State of Oklahoma, is exempt from ad valorem taxation.

For the year 1946, the county assessor of Tulsa county placed upon the tax assessment rolls of said county a tract of land consisting of 8.75 acres, together with the improvements thereon, and personal property, owned by •the Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother, a corporation. The assessed value of the land, the improvements, and the personal property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scripps Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dingwell v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Nuns of the Third Order v. YounkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Board County Com'rs v. Sisters of Sorrowful MotherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. In Re Farmers' Union Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. London Square Village v. OKLAHOMA CTY. EQUALIZATION AND EXCISE BD.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. County Assessor v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local No. 329Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Glass v. Oklahoma Methodist Home for the Aged, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. HATTIESBURG AREA SENIOR SERV., INC. v. Lamar CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Staggs v. PorterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API