Legal Opinion
United Technologies Corp. v. Heico Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 30, 1999No. 89-6934-CivPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON UNITED’S MOTION FOR RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATION
ROETTGER, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon United’s motion for Rule 54(b) certification so that United may appeal without delay the summary judgment orders the Court previously entered on August 25, 1997 and January 27,1998 respectively.
Plaintiff United filed suit against Heico and Jet Avion Corporation (Heico). United’s third, and final, amended complaint alleged three counts: count 1 was a federal claim for patent infringement, while counts 2 and 8 were state law claims alleging trade secret misappropriation and unfair…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. International Medical Prosthetics Research Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Household Products, Inc. v. Evans Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001