Commonwealth v. Biggs
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
In a jury trial, defendant Theodore Biggs was convicted of rape, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121, and incest, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4302. In this appeal, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict on the rape charge. We agree and reverse the judgment of sentence on that charge.
In considering challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner. Commonwealth v. Cropper, 463 Pa. 529, 345 A.2d 645 (1975). The test to be applied in this review of the evidence is whether, accepting as true…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CheathamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. MlinarichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. VazquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. StambaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.