Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Buffalo County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

By the covenant in the deed to pay the mortgages plaintiff bound herself to pay them and thereby assumed a primary liability. Martin v. C. Aultman & Co. 80 Wis. 150, 49 N. W. 749. She did not pay as a volunteer — she did no more than she had agreed to do. There was no need for her to act to protect her own interests. There was.no ágreement that she should have security for her payment. She was not a surety for the payment of the mortgage debt. Under those circumstances she is not entitled to subrogation. Murphy v. Baldwin, 159 Wis. 567, 150 N. W. 957; Bank of Baraboo v. Prothero, 215 Wis.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conner v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bank of Baraboo v. ProtheroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Martin v. C. Aultman & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Murphy v. BaldwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Klemens v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. GREEN TREE ESTATES, INC. v. FurstenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies v. Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Rock-Tenn Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API