Legal Opinion
Perry v. Gold & Laine, P.C.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 25, 2005No. Civil Action 04-6255 (FLW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
The Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff pro se Victoria Perry’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Ms. Perry”) complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) and 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, for summary judgment, and to have Plaintiff declared a vexatious litigator. The Defendants are Gold & Laine, P.C., Carl D. Poplar, P.A., Jeffrey E. Gold, Esq., Evan E. Laine, Esq., Carl D. Poplar, Esq., Christy A. Cicalese, Michele Laine, Brandon Laine and Jessica Laine. Two issues are before the Court. First, whether Plaintiffs complaint can survive a motion to dismiss, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeNardo v. MaassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Davis v. Township of PaulsboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- EDMONDSON v. LILLISTON FORD, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- LAVINE v. AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- LAVINE v. AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.