Wood v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circmt Judge.
The dispute in tMs ease concerns Michael Wood’s claim'for partial disability payments from Ms former employer, Bath Iron Works, Inc. (“Bath”). His benefits were termmated on the ground that Wood had been offered Ms pre-mjury wages and more by Bath in a new capacity at Bath’s shipyard in Bath, Maine, but had declined the job offer because he had relocated to another state. The problem posed is obvious; the solution is not.
The underlying facts are largely undisputed. Starting in January 1988, Wood worked as an insulator at the Bath, Maine sMpyard, installing fiberglass and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. HolidayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Neely v. Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Giboo v. Certified Transmission RebuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Carden v. D.C. DOESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- Carswell v. E. Pihl & SonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.