Tidal Refining Co. v. Ballard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS, ,7.
This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission.
Wm. E. p. Ballard, hereinafter called claimant, was employed by the Tidal Refining Company, hereinafter called petitioner, as a general yard workman. Claimant filed with the State Industrial Commission, on May 11, 1932, an employee’s' first notice of injury, giving the date of the accidental injury as “about January 20, 1932,” caused by acid fumes getting “in eyes, head and lungs.” To this claim a response was filed May 25, 1932, alleging failure to give written notice of the accidental injury within…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Continental Oil Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Dover Oil Corp. v. BellmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- J. J. Harrison Construction Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Evans-Wallower Lead Co. v. DrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Empire Pipe Line Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.