Legal Opinion

Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1892No. 14,182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; E. R. Garber, Judge. Action by the Kennedy &,Shaw Lumber Company against Joseph. W. Taylor, W. S. Somervell and E. Lund, as co-partners, for the recovery of money. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants Taylor and Somervell appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

VANCLIEF, C.

This is an action to recover from the defendants, as copartners, the sum of $1,815.59 for lumber sold and delivered to them by plaintiff. The defendant Lund failed to answer, and his default was entered. The other defendants answered, denying all material allegations of the complaint. The cause was tried by the court, and a joint judgment was rendered against all the defendants. The defendants Taylor and Somervell appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The principal point made by appellants is that the finding by the court that the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Crawford v. Independent Stove Pipe WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fee v. McPhee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Bissell v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Schwaegler Co. v. MarchesottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Amunategui v. Spokane Cattle Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API