Hirzel v. Silker

Richards, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The only question before this Court is whether under the provisions of the case stated, which is a part of the record in this case, Hirzel and Corletto, the defendants below, appellants, were required to give three months’ previous notice in writing of their intention to terminate the lease. They contend that there is no reason why the parties to a lease should not agree that the same should terminate at the expiration of a specified time, and that this intention is clearly expressed in the lease under consideration. The second paragraph of the…