People v. Wallert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carro, J.
Two days after a jury had convicted him of first degree rape and related crimes, defendant was served with *48a summons and complaint in a civil action for $18,000,000 damages arising from the rape incident. Although the prosecutor knew prior to the trial that the complainant had consulted an attorney who was but awaiting the outcome of the criminal action, the prosecutor felt no duty to disclose this information to defendant’s counsel. (See Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83.) Defendant made a CPL 330.30 motion to set aside the verdict, which was denied without opinion.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. CwiklaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. KnowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- O'Neal v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- People v. ShakurNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.