In re the Claim of Blankenship

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 20, 2000, which charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board was bound by *819its prior decision, affirmed by this Court on appeal (282 AD2d 861), that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she had been hired as a per diem substitute cleaner whose hours varied according to the employer’s needs and she quit her employment due to a reduced work schedule. Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the…