Legal Opinion
Redfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 5, 2005No. 03-10324-BCPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed the present action on October 21, 2003 seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiffs claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The action originally was assigned to the Honorable George E. Woods, but was reassigned to the undersigned upon Judge…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hamper v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Abel v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Anteer v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Berry v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Brown v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.