Legal Opinion

Berry v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 23, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01906Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PHILLIP BERRY, ) CASE NO. 1:18-cv-01906 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID A. RUIZ ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Comm’r of Soc. Sec., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) Defendant. ) Plaintiff, Philip Berry (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), challenges the final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter “Commissioner”), denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 1381

et seq. (“Act”). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Eddie W. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis M. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Barbara L. BRAINARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ruby E. Heston v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API