Legal Opinion

United States v. Cooper

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 4, 1976No. Nos. 75-120-Cr-J-T, 75-156-Cr-J-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge.

Defendants were indicted under 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922(b)(3), 922(b)(5), 922(m), and 924(a).1 The Government’s motion to consolidate these two cases for trial was unopposed by defendants and granted by the Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States Magistrate. Before trial, and pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e), defendants moved to suppress the bound acquisition-disposition volume (commonly and hereafter known as “the logbook”) that was kept by defendants during their business, and all evidentiary information gathered therefrom.

*367THE FACTS

Defendant Vernon F.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CooperDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API