Legal Opinion

Banks v. Rodenbach

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Dallas Circuit Cowrt. Action to recover for work and labor performed by plaintiff for defendant Rodenbach. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace, and a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendants appealed to the Circuit Court, where a trial was had which also resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

i. exempsonS'eara! ings: subcontractor, The cause was submitted to the court below upon the pleadings and the following agreed facts: “ 1. That defendant Rodenbach made a contract to erect a dwelling-house, and furnish mate- ...... . rial therefor, for a certain agreed price.

“ 2. That thereafter defendant Rodenbach entered into a verbal contract with plaintiff, in which it was agreed that plaintiff should do the mason work upon said building, and buy, select and furnish the material therefor, for the sum of $184.50, which sum was to 'pay for both material and work; that defendants were to…

2Cited by6 opinions

Millington v. LaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. GalvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
Bradley v. EarleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
Shelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
Kleinsmith v. Alcoa Employees & Community Credit Union (Kleinsmith)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.