Legal Opinion

Millington v. Laurer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Buchcman District Court. — Hon. D. J. Lenehan, Judge. Action to recover for the painting of two pictures. There was a trial by the court, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

In March, April and May, 1891, F. C. Merrill painted for the defendant two pictures at the agreed price of one hundred dollars. On the ninth day of June, 1891, Merrill assigned his account for the painting to the plaintiff, a nonresident of this state. In the year 1873 one Mason recovered in the circuit court of Buchanan county a judgment against Merrill for the sum of one hundred and forty-two dollars and ten cents and interest thereon at ten per cent, per annum, and six dollars and sixty cents costs. That judgment is unpaid. It was assigned to James Dalton, and by him assigned to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curlee v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Kaiser v. SeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Reynolds v. HainesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Mudge v. LanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Banks v. RodenbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Commerce Union Bank v. Haffner (In Re Haffner)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Atlantic Life Insurance v. RingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Kerr v. Tyler Guaranty State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Cleveland v. McCannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API