Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pedigo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 16151PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WILLIAMS, C.

P. H. Pedigo. as administrator of the estate of B. R. Ped-igo, commenced his action for damages against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and joined in the action Earl Humphreys, who was in the employ of the railway as a fireman at the time of the accident. The allegations of the petition charging negligence in causing the death of plaintiff’s decedent are, in substance:

First, that B. R. Pedigo, the deceased, was walking along on the railway track, where it had been the practice of persons to travel for a. long time; that the travel of pedestrians back…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Weleetka Cotton Oil Co. v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. S. H. Kress & Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Carpenter v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Kurn v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API