Legal Opinion

State v. Ziller

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 16, 2011No. 2011AP416-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

¶ 1. Michael T. Ziller appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Ziller argues that the circuit court failed to exercise its sentencing discretion when it did not expressly assess Ziller's ability to pay a $250 DNA surcharge. According to Ziller, our decision in State v. Cherry, 2008 WI App 80, 312 Wis. 2d 203, 752 N.W.2d 393, requires circuit courts to explain their reasons for imposing a $250 DNA surcharge. Ziller does not object to his nine-year bifurcated sentence or the requirement that he pay his victims roughly $10,000 in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GallionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PayanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Tramell E. StarksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Renato Capili Bosi, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-AppelleeSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
  3. State v. Tramell E. StarksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. VesperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API