Legal Opinion

United States Court of Appeals v. Jose Antonio Yanez-Saucedo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2002No. 00-50606PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRIGHT, Circuit Jugde.

In this appeal, Jose Antonio Yanez-Sau-cedo argues that the district court erred in concluding that his conviction for third-degree rape under Wash. Rev.Code § 9A.44.060 constituted an aggravated felony for sentencing enhancement purposes under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 (2000). 1 He also argues that his enhanced sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because his arguments lack merit, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

In August 2000, Yanez-Saucedo, a Mexican citizen, pled guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. SandovalWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. United States v. Jose Sarmiento-FunesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Candelario Silvestre Beltran-MunguiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Rafael Cruz-EscotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Miguel Angel Gonzalez-TamarizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API