Legal Opinion

Pounders v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1953No. 8 Div. 280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of reckless driving, in violation of Section 3, Title 36, Code 1940.

The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is not presented. The affirmative charge was not requested, neither was there a motion for a new trial, nor a motion to exclude the evidence. Whited v. State, 27 Ala.App. 466, 174 So. 545; Driggers v. State, 36 Ala.App. 637, 61 So.2d 865.

We have not been favored with a brief for the defendant, but have carefully examined the record, as the law requires, and find no reversible error.

The jury assessed a fine of $25 and as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Ex parte Joice & SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Whited v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Ex parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pounders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Griggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Holt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API