Wenzel v. Kieruj
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Paul Wenzel against Felix F. Kieruj for the recovery of the value of labor and materials supplied to the defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff had the contract for installing a steam heating plant in St. Francis Church, in the city of Detroit. It is his claim that the contract did not require him to cover certain pipes in the basement with asbestos felt, but that he did cover them in pursuance of an order of and an agreement with the architect, and he now claims compensation therefor as an extra. In the trial court, he recovered his full claim. Several defenses were made to the claim.
The material questions which are raised in this court by the several assignments of error are:(1) Was Felix F. Kieruj properly made a party…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Topps-Toeller, Inc v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Klas v. Pearce Hardware & Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Welch v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975