Legal Opinion

Avey v. Town of Brant

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Payments coerced by duress may be recovered back. “ The coercion, however, must be illegal, unjust or oppressive.” (Deshong v. City of New York, 176 N. Y. 475, 479.) The complaint alleges no facts showing that it was illegal, unjust dr oppressive for. the town to attempt to collect moneys apparently due to it from the Supervisor. The words “ wrongfully claimed ” state a mere conclusion and do not imply that defendant knew that plaintiff had expended the money for authorized town purposes. All that is alleged is consistent with threats to enforce what the town believed to be its legal rights,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deshong v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Benson v. MonroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. J. Richard Dirose v. Pk Management Corp., Nicholas A. Demare, Frank Ciccarelli, John S. Russo, Harry Kursh, Anthony Curatolo and Jerome DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Twenty Miljam-350 IED JammersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Blumenfeld v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API