Legal Opinion

United States v. Twenty Miljam-350 IED Jammers

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 22, 2011No. Docket 10-1781-cvPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Claimant Alon Wallach appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lewis A. Kaplan, Judge, ordering the forfeiture to plaintiff United States, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 401(a), of certain communication-jamming devices, to wit, the defendant-m-rem Twenty Miljam-350 IED Jammers (the “Jammers”), owned by Wallach and a company of which he was the majority shareholder and chief executive officer (“CEO”). The district court dismissed Wallaeh’s claim challenging the requested forfeiture, ruling that Wallach lacked standing to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Inst. of Int'l Educ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. Jean Robert Saint-Jean v. Emigrant Mortg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  3. Jeda Capital-56, LLC v. Village of PotsdamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Anderson v. DimonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  5. Andre v. Mattress FirmDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API