Legal Opinion

Cruse v. Stayput Clamp & Coupling Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1945No. 15,553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Albert F. Cruse as the director of revenue of the State of Colorado, and Leon C. Lavington as the state treasurer of Colorado, plaintiffs in error, will hereinafter be designated plaintiffs, and the Stayput Clamp and Coupling Company, a corporation, defendant in error, will hereinafter be designated as defendant. Plaintiffs sued out this writ of error to review an adverse judgment of the district court.

Plaintiff Cruse assessed additional taxes against defendant on its income for the years 1941 and 1942 in the amount of $2,732.67 alleged to be due as a deficit under the provisions of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Department of Treasury v. Wood Preserving Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Compañia General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Artophone Corporation v. CoaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holly Sugar Corp. v. Union Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. State v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Arvey Corp. v. FugateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. State v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. State v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API