State v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentNelson, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the conclusions reached in the majority opinion on defendant’s tax liability.
It is undisputed that the taxpayer is an Iowa corporation domiciled in that state; that its business is the manufacture and sale of cement and cement products; and that it maintains its home and principal business offices, as well as its manufacturing plant, at Mason City, Iowa.
Taxpayer has never qualified under M. S. A. 303.03 as a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, nor does the record indicate that the staté has ever demanded such qualification or…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.