Legal Opinion

Coleman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1999No. 97-CM-634PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was charged with possession of marijuana 1 and possession of drug paraphernalia. 2 Before trial he moved to suppress certain evidence that was seized during a search of his home. Appellant claimed that despite a eoncededly valid search warrant, the officers violated the Fourth Amendment and applicable knock-and-announce statutes when they entered his house by means of a ruse without first announcing their true purpose and authority. The trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, denied the motion. F ol-lowing a non-jury trial, appellant was convicted of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. District of Columbia v. MancousoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. United States v. Stefan RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API