Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Panico v. Young

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 NY2d 820).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Brooklyn Hospital v. LennonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Giblin v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. DercoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Curley v. DilworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Ring v. LangdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. In Re the Arbitration Between Dobbs Ferry Union Free School District & Dobbs Ferry United TeachersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API