Legal Opinion

Barish v. Barish

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1983No. Nos. 2849, 2850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Litigation ensuing from the dissolution of a law firm partnership has given rise to an order, entered September 22, 1982, requiring appellants to escrow a percentage of the receipts collected by the partnership on cases in which appellee, a former partner, claims an interest. The order also requires appellants to “certify” to appellee as to any and all funds received from said cases within thirty days from issuance of the order.

Appellants contend on this appeal that the aforesaid order is in the nature of a preliminary injunction and, having been entered without a hearing or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Mamula v. UNITED STEELWORKERS of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Pubusky v. D.M.F., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Rosenzweig v. FACTORSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.M. Skier Agency, Inc. v. GoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Levin v. BarishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Levin v. BarishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API