Legal Opinion

City of Anaheim v. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1981No. 79-3803PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

The cities of Anaheim, Banning and Riverside appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees, various government officials and agencies and several private utility companies (hereinafter “the utilities”). This is the fourth appeal arising out of the Navajo thermal-generation power plant in Page, Arizona.1 The Navajo plant eventually will supply power *1328to the United States for the Central Arizona Project (“CAP”). See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 1506, 47 L.Ed.2d 761…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Arizona Power Pooling Ass'n v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. City of Santa Clara, California v. Cecil Andrus, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior, Cecil Andrus, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and R. Keith Higginson, Individually and as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior v. City of Santa Clara, California, Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. City of Santa Clara, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. City of Anaheim v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Trust and William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C., and Counterclaim (88-1008) v. United States of America, and Counterclaim v. Rubenstein, Isaacs, Bordman & Lax Corporation, Counterclaim Lowell R. Stuckman, Intervenor-Appellant (88-2194)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Wilcox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API